Subject: Re: [boost] [BB++] Consensus
From: Richard Hodges (hodges.r_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-02 16:33:18
If you can create an *easy* (i.e. impossible to get it wrong) way to
introduce deterministic garbage collection into c++, I think this might be
a big enough win to convince me that garbage collection can be considered
as a serious software engineering tool.
On 2 August 2017 at 18:18, Phil Bouchard via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> After the feedback I got back from the community, people agree they would
> rather improve C++ than seeing a new language taking off.
> I definitely agree but I would like professional opinions on how the
> following could be achieved:
> - to add instances of an object implicitly as each scope;
> - to add implicit references to these objects in top-level classes
> - to overload 'operator .'
> - to use 'auto' for member variables instead of 'decltype'
> Thanks for your help I really appreciate.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk