Subject: Re: [boost] Microsoft vs The Boost License
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-05 16:57:18
> 3) And now here I am with Microsoft trying to copy the idea behind
> root_ptr's node_proxy:
> With their "deferred_ptr heap":
Herb's been banging a drum regarding alternative mechanisms for
allocation cleanup in C++ for as long as I can remember. I believe that
repo above was to demonstrate how easy it would be for C++ to
standardise some GC implementation based on the above.
I personally think he's wrong on standardised GC for C++, and so does
almost everyone else I know. But Herb has more than earned respect for
any opinion he takes on anything in my book.
And I appreciate that you feel plagiarised. But standards folk almost
never propose standardisation of their own inventions by definition. I
wouldn't take it personally.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk