|
Boost : |
Subject: [boost] Microsoft vs The Boost License
From: Phil Bouchard (philippeb8_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-05 14:04:15
Hi,
Just to put everybody in context:
1) Microsoft had invested into Corel so that they get rid of Corel Linux
back in 2000 when I was working there:
https://www.forbes.com/2000/10/03/1003corel.html
2) Microsoft once again copied my Fornux PowerCalc after I had presented
it to them using some web interface:
http://www.fornux.com/
With their Microsoft PowerToys:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_PowerToys#Included_applications
3) And now here I am with Microsoft trying to copy the idea behind
root_ptr's node_proxy:
https://github.com/philippeb8/root_ptr
With their "deferred_ptr heap":
https://github.com/hsutter/gcpp
So for some reason I do not trust Microsoft. And I was wondering if the
Boost license protects us from an idea behind a library we wrote.
Otherwise this makes the Boost license not very useful.
Thanks a lot for your help!
-Phil
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk