|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Tom Westerhout (kot.tom97_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-06 22:04:34
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>
> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>
> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>
> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>
> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
there a random_shuffle.
2) Boost.Wave failed due to errors in Spirit. There's no auto_ptr in
std:: anymore.
3) Boost.Locale failed, again because of auto_ptr.
* GCC (-std=c++14)
Everything builds fine.
I would like to complain about the amount of warnings though... Way to
many for my taste.
Tom
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk