Re: [boost] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Raffi Enficiaud (raffi.enficiaud_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-06 22:59:58

Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :
> On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
>>
>> https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
>>
>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>>
>> 0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
>> c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
>> 7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
>> 537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
>> boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
>>
>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
>> candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
>> success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>
> Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
>
> * Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
>
>   1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
>   there a random_shuffle.

The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE

and the ones of bind1st by
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS

Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?

Thanks for the report,
Raffi