|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-16 01:12:15
> My beef with DOxygen goes much, much deeper. I'm aware of the idea that
> it is an implementation of literate programming and I'm credited it in
> the past for this reason. But there are at least two big problems with it.
My main beef with Doxygen is reduced code-readability, which I think has
been mentioned a number of times on this list by various others-
M
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk