Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-16 01:12:15

> My beef with DOxygen goes much, much deeper. I'm aware of the idea that
> it is an implementation of literate programming and I'm credited it in
> the past for this reason. But there are at least two big problems with it.

My main beef with Doxygen is reduced code-readability, which I think has
been mentioned a number of times on this list by various others-

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at