Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: impl_ptr (pimpl)
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-16 18:49:46
Le 16/08/2017 Ã 17:38, Hans Dembinski via Boost a Ã©crit :
> Hi Vladimir,
>> On 15. Aug 2017, at 02:51, Vladimir Batov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> After much procrastination I would like to request a formal review for the pimpl library... once and for all :-) (given it's been through a few almost-reviews and discussions)... to get some kind of a resolution one way or the other. :-)
> I looked into the documentation and from a user perspective, impl_ptr looks very nice, I'd love to use it. I also like the documentation so far. It needs some straightening of typos, but it is a light and enjoyable read.
I'm missing the reference documentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk