Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: impl_ptr (pimpl)
From: Hans Dembinski (hans.dembinski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-16 15:38:50
> On 15. Aug 2017, at 02:51, Vladimir Batov via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> After much procrastination I would like to request a formal review for the pimpl library... once and for all :-) (given it's been through a few almost-reviews and discussions)... to get some kind of a resolution one way or the other. :-)
I looked into the documentation and from a user perspective, impl_ptr looks very nice, I'd love to use it. I also like the documentation so far. It needs some straightening of typos, but it is a light and enjoyable read.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk