Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs

Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-17 22:53:46

> Granted I don't know anything about this and might just be misreading 
> something, but from the minute I spent reading that page it does look 
> like only three tools are required if you only want HTML output:
> 
>    * doxygen
>    * xsltproc
>    * quickbook
> 
> (And the latter is included in Boost sources, so really that's only two. 
>   The third install is if you want PDF output for anything other than 
> Accumulators.)

All I can tell you is that I struggled with it. It may be easier on 
linux, I don't know. But almost everything lacked explanation, including 
the whole jamfile process (or if there was documentation, I couldn't 
find it).