Subject: Re: [boost] Improving Boost Docs
From: Soul Studios (matt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-17 22:52:26
> Actually, XSL is a natural fit for C++ devs IMHO.
> It's both functional (so easy for template meta-programmers),
> and procedural (so easy for imperative language programmers).
XSL is procedural as well nowadays? Wow, I have been out of the loop,
since... well 2004 I guess. I guess a lot can happen in 13 years.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk