Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] BOOST_STATIC_CONSTEXPR in C++11 vs C++14
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-23 11:29:48

On 22/08/2017 19:40, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> Actually I think it's a lot simpler than this: when it was added,
>> |BOOST_CONSTEXPR_OR_CONST did what it says, and what it's documented
>> to do - namely declare something const or constexpr (which implied
>> const at
> the time). Subsequently it's been broken by C++14 where constexpr no
> longer implies const.
> I don't think that this is true; constexpr does imply const in C++14
> for variables. It no longer implies const for member functions, but
> that's a separate matter.

Ah, I think you're correct - I'd obviously misremembered this -
apologies for the noise, we can just forget the whole thing!


This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at