Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-04 17:23:56
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost
> Den 04-09-2017 kl. 18:50 skrev Glen Fernandes via Boost:
>> A review date for Double_Ended was never published on the schedule.
>> The last state on that library on the review schedule was:
>> Submission: Double-Ended
>> Submitter: Benedek Thaler
>> Review Manager: Needed
>> Review Dates: -
>> This was before all unscheduled reviews were purged from the schedule.
> I long ago (11th of May) contacted the review wizards:
> Only John replied, and he agreed to setting the date. After some time, I
> asked if I had to update the review schedule (this is 26th of June), but
> John said he would do it.
> Are there review wizards that are not mentioned in the above page?
The page is still accurate. There was probably some disconnect between
the two wizards, because nobody else had any idea that Double-Ended
even had a review manager, let alone was scheduled for this week.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk