Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?
From: John Phillips (johnphillipsithaca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-06 06:04:22
This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we start by
adding a week to the duration for each review (to give people who want
to participate in both time to do so) and run them as scheduled. Both
Fit and Double Ended did the right thing, and I made a mistake, so I
don't want to penalize either in any way if possible.
On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review,
> running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon
> with John (Phillips).
> Now, when I look at
> http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html it seems that
> there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly
> overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
> kind regards
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk