Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?
From: Benedek Thaler (thalerbenedek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-06 06:15:51
Fit received quite a bit of attention recently on the ML, it wouldn't be
fair to steal the show.
The schedule is empty otherwise - given that DoubleEnded is sitting there
for years, a few more days wouldn't hurt.
On Sep 6, 2017 08:04, "John Phillips" <johnphillipsithaca_at_[hidden]> wrote:
This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we start by
adding a week to the duration for each review (to give people who want to
participate in both time to do so) and run them as scheduled. Both Fit and
Double Ended did the right thing, and I made a mistake, so I don't want to
penalize either in any way if possible.
On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended review,
> running from today to 17th of September. This is what we agreed upon with
> John (Phillips).
> Now, when I look at http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html
> it seems that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled, greatly
> overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
> Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
> kind regards
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk