Re: [boost] [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?

Subject: Re: [boost] [review queue] we seem to have double allocated early September for review --- what to do?
From: John Phillips (johnphillipsithaca_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-06 06:17:46

   But, a few more days might make it harder for the Double Ended team 
to be able to be as involved as they should in the review.

             John

On 09/06/2017 02:15 AM, Benedek Thaler wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Fit received quite a bit of attention recently on the ML, it wouldn't 
> be fair to steal the show.
> The schedule is empty otherwise - given that DoubleEnded is sitting 
> there for years, a few more days wouldn't hurt.
>
> Thanks,
> Benedek
>
> On Sep 6, 2017 08:04, "John Phillips" <johnphillipsithaca_at_[hidden] 
> <mailto:johnphillipsithaca_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>
>       Thorsten,
>
>       This is my mistake. If people accept the idea, I suggest we
>     start by adding a week to the duration for each review (to give
>     people who want to participate in both time to do so) and run them
>     as scheduled. Both Fit and Double Ended did the right thing, and I
>     made a mistake, so I don't want to penalize either in any way if
>     possible.
>
>                 John
>
>
>
>     On 09/04/2017 11:26 AM, Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>
>         Hi All,
>
>         I was about to announce the start of the Boost.Double_ended
>         review, running from today to 17th of September. This is what
>         we agreed upon with John (Phillips).
>
>         Now, when I look at
>         http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html
>         <http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html> it seems
>         that there is also a review of the Fit library scheduled,
>         greatly overlapping with Boost.Double_ended.
>
>         Do we run two reviews simultaneously, or what?
>
>         kind regards
>
>         Thorsten
>
>
>