Subject: Re: [boost] Why is the boost documentation so bad?
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-08 15:23:31
Florian Lindner wrote:
> why is the documentation so bad?
The fundamental answer to your question is that Boost libraries
are subject to peer review, and in the standard invitation to
submit reviews one of the questions is "What is your evaluation
of the documentation?". Either the reviewers feel that the
documentation is good enough, or they feel that on balance the
library's good points outweigh the poor documentation.
I encourage you to take part in reviews.
To those who have replied to Florian calling him a "leach" etc:
Don't Shoot The Messenger.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk