Subject: Re: [boost] Why is the boost documentation so bad?
From: paul (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-08 15:42:05
On Fri, 2017-09-08 at 16:23 +0100, Phil Endecott via Boost wrote:
> Florian Lindner wrote:
> > why is the documentation so bad?
> The fundamental answer to your question is that Boost libraries
> are subject to peer review, and in the standard invitation to
> submit reviews one of the questions is "What is your evaluation
> of the documentation?".Â Â Either the reviewers feel that the
> documentation is good enough, or they feel that on balance the
> library's good points outweigh the poor documentation.
> I encourage you to take part in reviews.
Yes, and there is a review happening right now for the Fit library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk