Subject: Re: [boost] [Pool] no maintainer, and should perhaps be deprecated?
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-09-27 22:36:23
On 28/09/2017 06:07, John Maddock wrote:
> There is possibly another issue: the performance of most std lib
> allocators has improved to the point that it's actually questionable
> whether using the pool lib has much real benefit (but this need
> quantifying so the cases where it does help are documented).Â Maybe
> that's what has put people off, or maybe it's just not sexy enough for
> anyone to take on, but I still hope that someone will....
FWIW, I tried to use Pool (specifically pool_allocator) in an
application once, but ran into too many problems (and locks! Locks are
the bane of my existence).
I used nedmalloc quite successfully for a long time, but eventually the
std allocators caught up and it was simpler and sufficiently performant
to use those instead.
(Of course as always YMMV depending on your allocation patterns.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk