Re: [boost] Modularizing explicit-failures-markup.xml

Subject: Re: [boost] Modularizing explicit-failures-markup.xml
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-01 20:59:08

On 1 October 2017 at 19:58, Steven Watanabe via Boost
<boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> AMDG
>
> On 10/01/2017 12:35 PM, Daniel James via Boost wrote:
>> On 1 October 2017 at 18:50, Steven Watanabe via Boost
>> <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>   Once you have a script for merging the markup files,
>>> hooking it into the regression scripts should be trivial.
>>
>> Not really, I know from experience that maintenance is much, much
>> easier if I run things myself. I also find the regression testing
>> system to be impenetrable - I can't find anything in the source that
>> loads the file in,
>
> https://github.com/boostorg/regression/blob/develop/reports/src/boost_report.cpp#L78
>
>> and the documentation refers to a script that
>> doesn't exist.
>>
>
> Meaning build_results_all.sh?  Rene apparently moved
> things around since the last time I looked.  After a
> lot of hunting, I finally found it here
> https://github.com/boostorg/regression/tree/ci/test-reports

Apart from the complexity of the system, it looks like it doesn't have
access to the whole tree, so it would be costly to do it there.