Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] [SPAM] Re: Modularizing explicit-failures-markup.xml
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-03 15:35:18

Next message: paul: "Re: [boost] Informal CMake meeting at CPPCon"
Previous message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] [SPAM] Re: Informal CMake meeting at CPPCon"
In reply to: Daniel James: "[boost] Modularizing explicit-failures-markup.xml"

Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
> [...]
> Does that sound okay? It might be better if the regression scripts
> handled this themselves, but I'm not sure if anyone would be available
> to implement that.
>
> Daniel

This is great (with the caveat that it should be in meta/, not status/, as
mentioned elsewhere)! Thanks for doing this!

Louis

--
Sent from: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Dev-f2600599.html

Next message: paul: "Re: [boost] Informal CMake meeting at CPPCon"
Previous message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] [SPAM] Re: Informal CMake meeting at CPPCon"
In reply to: Daniel James: "[boost] Modularizing explicit-failures-markup.xml"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk