Subject: Re: [boost] [SPAM] Re: Informal CMake meeting at CPPCon
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-03 16:27:47
On 10/3/17 8:18 AM, Louis Dionne via Boost wrote:
> Boost - Dev mailing list wrote
>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost
>> > wrote:
>>> Have you discussed the possibility for the two (Boost.Build and CMake)
>>> to coexist...
>> David Sankel made it pretty clear that in the "final solution", CMake
>> will be mandatory and Boost.Build will be optional. Unless I
>> misunderstood (David, feel free to correct me).
> I don't remember anyone making that statement.
Hmmm - I do remember getting that impression though it may not have been
explicitly stated. My reaction was to point out that we didn't have to
address this issue until we actually had a real CMake alternative for
Boost. I think this got us over the hump to where could find some
common ground on something that would move us forward. Of course I
don't remember every word and detail now. But I believe that my
original summary captures the essential sense of the mercifully short
and in my view productive meeting.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk