Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-05 17:23:55

Den 05-10-2017 kl. 18:03 skrev degski via Boost:
> On 5 October 2017 at 18:37, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> Secondly, I think we can see the current numbers as a best case of what is
>> possible with the extra functionality provided by DoubleEnded. There are
>> other serialization libs out there, and they should be able to benefit even
>> if there is no way to specialize for the binary case in Boost.Serialization.
>>
> 
> I added devector to cereal, the file is attached and should be placed in
> the types sub-dir (of cereal). It's just a copy of the std::vector code,
> with the std::vector<bool> specialisation taken out. Not tested.

Cute. But would one not use std::is_trivially_copyable instead of 
std::is_arithmetic?

And instead of resize, should you not call the version that avoids 
double initialization?

kind regards

Thorsten