[boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?

Subject: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: James E. King, III (jking_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-08 13:04:33

I filed 3 defects into Boost Trac for Boost.Random based on work I just did
on adding CI integration, and the maintainer that Trac assigned to these
new items was "No-Maintainer".  That seems incorrect?  The backlog in trac
for random also has "No-Maintainer" assigned to all the items.

For folks who like (potential) compiler optimization bugs:
https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/13247

- Jim