Subject: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: James E. King, III (jking_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-08 13:04:33
I filed 3 defects into Boost Trac for Boost.Random based on work I just did
on adding CI integration, and the maintainer that Trac assigned to these
new items was "No-Maintainer". That seems incorrect? The backlog in trac
for random also has "No-Maintainer" assigned to all the items.
For folks who like (potential) compiler optimization bugs:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk