|
Boost :
|
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
On 10/08/17 17:00, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
>
> Re Trac, I just enabled Github Issues for Random. Perhaps we finally
> need to do that for all libraries.
I think it should be left up to the library maintainers.
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- Previous message: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
- Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk