Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: AsbjÃ¸rn (lordcrc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 11:00:36
On 09.10.2017 05:10, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:
> While I personally agree, I don't think this is a choice anyone can
> impose on the people who have to maintain the individual boost
> libraries. We may encourage library maintainers to use a particular
> issue tracker, but ultimately the choice is theirs.
How so? You require a review for accepting Boost libraries. I don't see how
requiring the use of a specific issue tracker is different.
As a user it's _significantly_ better to have a single issue tracker to
consider, instead of having to go on a hunt to find the right one to use for
each library and managing the various login credentials.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk