Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Trac, random, No-Maintainer?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 17:23:59
> > While I personally agree, I don't think this is a choice anyone can
> > impose on the people who have to maintain the individual boost
> > libraries.
At some point, I think that we have to bite the bullet and retire Trac. It's
served us well but we're in the Github era now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk