Subject: Re: [boost] Master Regression Tests Failing
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-09 23:15:54
On 10/9/2017 7:09 PM, Robert Ramey via Boost wrote:
> On 10/9/17 3:20 PM, Tom Kent via Boost wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Peter Dimov via Boost < Can we back
>> out this change until we can figure out a way to do it where it
>> doesn't break our regression suite?
>> I don't believe there is a way to specify that the master tests use the
>> master version of build, If I recall, a long time ago, we decided to
>> use a
>> separate version of build for the regression tests, instead of the one
>> from the superproject? Is this just the head of develop? Does anyone
>> remember the rationale for this?
> Cant we just use the master version of boost build for ALL the testing -
> master and develop branch?Â Does it make sense to use an experimental
> version of the test tools to test anything?
Am I the only one who thinks it logical that a regression test for
'master' should use the 'master' branch of everything and the regression
test for 'develop' should use the 'develop' branch of everything ? Why
is this even going to be debated ? I have no idea why the 'master'
branch uses the 'devlop' branch of Boost Build, but that does not seem
like it can ever be right.
> Robert Ramey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk