Subject: Re: [boost] Master Regression Tests Failing
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-10 02:28:24
Le 10/10/2017 Ã 01:32, Peter Dimov via Boost a Ã©critÂ :
> Tom Kent wrote:
>> Would it be possible to put this feature on some kind of flag
>> (default off) until the features it depends on have been in master
>> for a while?
> Not in this case. There are three interlocked changes (to Build, to
> Thread, to the superproject) that need to be applied at the same time.
> Applying any of these in isolation breaks everything.
> Using master for master testing seems just common sense, although
> there's probably a reason things are done the way they are.
Peter, let me know when I should merge Boost.Thread to master.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk