Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines
From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-14 21:04:13

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Recommend dropping test coverage on msvc-7.1 and msvc-8.0"
Previous message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines"
In reply to: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines"
Next in thread: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira: "Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines (Was: Boost.HTTPKit, a new library from the makers of Beast!)"

On 14-10-17 20:04, Phil Endecott via Boost wrote:
> In some cases they can have negative cost. See Gor
> Nishanov's CppCon 2015 presentation, "C++ Coroutines - a
> negative overhead abstraction".

I'm sorry I assumed from experience with Boost Coroutine only. This is
indeed fantastic stuff and I had seen that particular vid. Thanks for
correcting my memory,

Seth

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Recommend dropping test coverage on msvc-7.1 and msvc-8.0"
Previous message: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines"
In reply to: Phil Endecott: "Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines"
Next in thread: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira: "Re: [boost] Push/pull parsers & coroutines (Was: Boost.HTTPKit, a new library from the makers of Beast!)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk