Subject: Re: [boost] [msvc] #warning preprocessor directive
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-17 13:14:29
On 10/17/2017 8:10 AM, Beman Dawes via Boost wrote:
> I find it very irritating that VC++ does not support #warning, and have
> opened a feature request:
> The last time #warning was suggested it was rejected because not enough
> people voted for it. So please consider upvoting it on the above link.
> The lack of #warning affects Boost libraries in that developers avoid
> otherwise useful warnings because of the hassle for using an extension not
> supported by VC++.
Maybe someone could promote #warning as an official addition to the C++
standard ? I realize doing anything further with the C++ preprocessor
may be seen as negative because C++ usually attempts de-emphasize the
preprocessor, but adding #warning officially could hardly be
controversial or complicated ( famous last words ).
As for vc++ I find it a little amusing that we should ask them to add
#warning to their preprocessor when their preprocessor is not standard
conforming to begin with. Maybe, like congressman, we could tie the
#warning "appropriations" to the general "bill" for creating a
conformant preprocessor and submit it to Microsoft as a "congressional"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk