Re: [boost] RFC.. Steering Committee Bylaws Proposal

Subject: Re: [boost] RFC.. Steering Committee Bylaws Proposal
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-18 15:10:53

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Paul A. Bristow via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> I can understand that you are still spitting feathers about the crass
> handling of B2/Cmake, but this seems a big legalistic sledge
> hammer to try to solve that issue, and others too.
>

You do know that I could actually care less about what build system Boost
uses? And that has nothing to do with this.

> It is quite reasonable for the Steering Committee to opine that the number
> of users of Boost might be boosted by providing a way to
> use another build tool, but ultimately, the library writers will control
> what happens by voting with their feet, or fingers.
>

Nah.. Programmers have a long history of accepting edicts about the tools
and methods that others proclaim. And I doubt this will be any different
from that history.

Let's keep muddling on ;-)
>

Right.. Lets accept what is given without any say on it.

> and Carry On Coding :-)
>

Sure.. We'll rowing to the drum beat.

-- 
-- Rene Rivera
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net