Subject: Re: [boost] RFC.. Steering Committee Bylaws Proposal
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-18 23:38:10
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Niall Douglas via Boost <
> > I have to say.. Finding this stuff out now is rapidly decreasing my
> > confidence in the SC and the operation of Boost. It's a sad situation.
> > I'm worried this is just going to implode. I'd really like to find out
> > the rules truly are and what is going on. This is horribly saddening :-(
> It took me a while to figure out too. But there is a defined process for
> org change. Routes forward:
> 1. You get a demonstrated general consensus here that your proposed
> changes are widely agreed with by the community.
> 2. You persuade the SC that consensus by the community on a change
> cannot be reached due to disagreement or apathy, but a decision must be
> made or else it will threaten Boost's future.
I've been fully aware of that process for a long time. That's not the
unwritten rules I was referring to. It's all the other ones, like how they
I say all of the above from my past four years of dealing with the SC.
> If the above is inaccurate, I am sure SC members will volunteer
> themselves to correct me.
Haha.. Given previous history.. Highly unlikely they will volunteer a
> But I would say you have a fair chance under
> Route 2.
There's always a third option.
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk