Re: [boost] [BoostBook] how to automatically test code examples?

Subject: Re: [boost] [BoostBook] how to automatically test code examples?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-19 19:30:19

On 10/19/17 11:09 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:

> XML may be decent as a way of creating and passing around data in a 
> structured way, but having to write documentation in XML is a hopeless 
> task AFAICS. 

Agreed

> Quickbook is hugely superior and is a no-brainer to use. If 
> others prefer Asciidoc that's fine also. The point is that nobody need 
> write docs in XML if they do not want to and I do not think that most 
> people want to. I certainly don't.

Agreed.

Which is why a looked for a superior alternative editing boost book 
(XML) files.  I found it in XMLmind.

Robert Ramey