Subject: Re: [boost] [BoostBook] how to automatically test code examples?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-19 19:30:19
On 10/19/17 11:09 AM, Edward Diener via Boost wrote:
> XML may be decent as a way of creating and passing around data in a
> structured way, but having to write documentation in XML is a hopeless
> task AFAICS.
> Quickbook is hugely superior and is a no-brainer to use. If
> others prefer Asciidoc that's fine also. The point is that nobody need
> write docs in XML if they do not want to and I do not think that most
> people want to. I certainly don't.
Which is why a looked for a superior alternative editing boost book
(XML) files. I found it in XMLmind.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk