Subject: Re: [boost] [review][DoubleEnded] Review Results
From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-30 18:38:55
Den 28-10-2017 kl. 11:42 skrev Joaquin M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz via Boost:
> I am very much looking
> forward to
> your upcoming results with respect to the different resizing policies
> --it's been a very exciting theoretical discussion but now the time's
> come to see
> how the various proposals hold water.
> This may sound like an overstatement, but I think there's a possibility
> devector will compete with std::vector for the title of "default
> container of
> choice" the latter holds in the C++ community: during the review I've
> come to
> appreciate devector's potential for flexibility and improved performance.
> Results and time will say.
Indeed. I hope to do some work in this this week.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk