Re: [boost] [config] Rethinking feature macros?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Rethinking feature macros?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-06 18:03:04

Steven Watanabe wrote:

> We don't usually define macros independently for every compiler version. 
> The actual implementation generally looks like:
>
> #if COMPILER_VERSION < NNN
>   #define BOOST_NO_FEATURE
> #endif
>
> which is always the same amount of work regardless of whether it's a 
> positive or negative macro.

This ignores -std=... though.