Re: [boost] [config] Rethinking feature macros?

Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Rethinking feature macros?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-06 17:59:52

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > 3. Even if a compiler is out of wide use, we still maintain Config for 
> > it.
> >
> > https://github.com/boostorg/config/blob/develop/include/boost/config/compiler/digitalmars.hpp
>
> Sure, as long as we choose to. And we would still have to maintain and 
> test those files with positive macros.

I feel like we're talking past of each other here. What is there to maintain 
about digitalmars.hpp? It stays the same for eternity because the compiler 
is no longer developed so it's impossible for it to acquire a new feature.