Subject: Re: [boost] Adding polymorphic_value to boost
From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-18 18:29:46
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> On 11/18/17 00:36, Zach Laine via Boost wrote:
>> Not only do I want to see this put forth for review, but I'd also like to
>> see its review fast-tracked, since it's a target for standardization
>> currently being examined by LEWG.
> Not knowing anything about `polymorphic_value`, I welcome a new library
> submitted for a review, but I don't see why the review should be
> fast-tracked. Fast-tracked reviews are typically performed on something
> that the community is very familiar with (not only the concept but the
> implementation as well), which basically means it has to undergo a full
> review first. That the library is also being reviewed by someone else (e.g.
> LEWG) does not mean it has a free entry into Boost.
Agreed. What I meant by fast-tracked wasn't that it should be reviewed
differently, but that the review should happen sooner.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk