Subject: [boost] Fwd: Fwd: [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-01-28 23:16:19
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: degski <degski_at_[hidden]>
Date: 28 January 2018 at 17:11
Subject: Re: [boost] Fwd: [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to
To: VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira <vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden]>
On 28 January 2018 at 16:44, VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira <
> Can you elaborate on your point? If I'm left alone I'll miss your point.
I was mostly just responding to your example (which you asked me to do),
and how I would do that, without having to deal with exceptions and/or
outcomes. But, the more general point is, which Spirit in this case does
very well, is to deal with potential problems at the source, in an explicit
(comprehensive) way, without propagation of errors or exceptions.
> It's becoming confusing the more you go.
It's probably because I'm rowing against the tide here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk