Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Outcome v2 (Fri-19-Jan to Sun-28-Jan, 2018)
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-06 11:56:47
2018-02-06 10:31 GMT+01:00 Rob Stewart via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>:
> On February 3, 2018 8:56:35 AM EST, Andrzej Krzemienski via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > 2018-02-02 23:26 GMT+01:00 Emil Dotchevski via Boost
> > <boost_at_[hidden]>:
> > There are probably more cases, but my point is:
> > 1. Outcome is not meant to be a full failure-handling framework for
> > every
> > part of every program (even though it is technically possible to use
> > it this way).
> > 2. It addresses the specific cases through specific trade-offs where
> > it does not have to address all the issues of the full failure
> > handling framework.
> This sort of thing would have been useful in the docs to explain how
> outcome could fit into one's code.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk