Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 14:27:02

On 8 February 2018 at 03:20, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> The same is possible with library components, although it may incur more
> overhead. In case of boost/std::function, I would use boost::function or
> even a custom function wrapper internally (the latter is useful to remove
> the dependency on Boost.Function). I don't see any advantage of using
> std::function.

Using std::function has one advantage, though, it's standardised.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at