Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 15:16:14

On 02/08/18 17:27, degski via Boost wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 03:20, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The same is possible with library components, although it may incur more
>> overhead. In case of boost/std::function, I would use boost::function or
>> even a custom function wrapper internally (the latter is useful to remove
>> the dependency on Boost.Function). I don't see any advantage of using
>> std::function.
> Using std::function has one advantage, though, it's standardised.

In the context of this discussion, it's irrelevant.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at