Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 15:16:14
On 02/08/18 17:27, degski via Boost wrote:
> On 8 February 2018 at 03:20, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The same is possible with library components, although it may incur more
>> overhead. In case of boost/std::function, I would use boost::function or
>> even a custom function wrapper internally (the latter is useful to remove
>> the dependency on Boost.Function). I don't see any advantage of using
> Using std::function has one advantage, though, it's standardised.
In the context of this discussion, it's irrelevant.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk