Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 19:25:28
> >> Using std::function has one advantage, though, it's standardised.
> > In the context of this discussion, it's irrelevant.
> It seems only logical to me to decrease coupling with other boost
> libraries as time moves on, to use the std-equivalent of certain boost
This discussion is about link compatibility between code compiled with C++03
and code compiled with C++11. If your code uses std::function, it can't be
compiled with C++03 and therefore this thread is simply not for you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk