Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 21:06:49
> PS: I really don't understand the focus of boost to always want to compile
> stuff with the most archaic compilers possible. If your using an old
> compiler, just use a(n older) boost version that works with that specific
So mp11 and Beast need to be C++17 because those using C++11 can always use
an earlier version of Boost.
Except earlier versions of Boost have neither. Oops.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk