Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-08 23:22:14

degski wrote:

> But, do the libs you quoted use std::optional and std::string_view 
> (instead of their boost impersonations) when compiled with C++17?

Assuming a non-header-only library for the sake of going back onto the 
topic, this would create exactly the problems we've been discussing, if you 
link your C++17 code to the C++14-built library, or vice versa. For what 
gainz?