Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-09 16:17:40

On 9 February 2018 at 16:08, degski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 9 February 2018 at 09:45, Thomas Heller via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Since C++03 is the lowest level of C++ standards compatibility, it can
>> hardly "demand" anything. If you think it does please point out a C++03
>> construct which is not supported by later C++ standards.
>>
>>
>> std::auto_ptr.
>
>
> register keyword, trigraphs, operator++(bool), exception specifications.

Do any of our libraries use any of those?