Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-09 16:26:52

Am 09.02.2018 5:18 nachm. schrieb "Daniel James via Boost" <
boost_at_[hidden]>:

On 9 February 2018 at 16:08, degski via Boost <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 9 February 2018 at 09:45, Thomas Heller via Boost <
boost_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Since C++03 is the lowest level of C++ standards compatibility, it can
>> hardly "demand" anything. If you think it does please point out a C++03
>> construct which is not supported by later C++ standards.
>>
>>
>> std::auto_ptr.
>
>
> register keyword, trigraphs, operator++(bool), exception specifications.

Do any of our libraries use any of those?

Is this really the topic of this thread? Isn't it more about code depending
on boost libraries that might not be as easy to upgrade as one might think?
Or distributed binaries compiled with a different flavor than you favor?

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/
mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost