Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-10 20:23:12
On 10 February 2018 at 11:25, Andrey Semashev via Boost <
> Well, yes, but that's not a problem for libstdc++, because, presumably, it
> is always compiled with the latest C++ supported by the compiler.
Yeah, that is probably true, let's go with that!
Maybe a similar convention is possible for Boost as well, i.e. we support
> linking executables compiled only for C++ <= N, where N is the version that
> Boost was compiled for. It's difficult to enforce, though.
It would be better to up the minimum required version of C++ (to C++11),
and let those who don't want to move (pun intended), to stick with their
old copy (pun intended) of Boost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk