Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-11 00:15:43
On 02/10/18 23:23, degski via Boost wrote:
> It would be better to up the minimum required version of C++ (to C++11),
> and let those who don't want to move (pun intended), to stick with their
> old copy (pun intended) of Boost.
I don't think this is necessary. And given that we don't normally do
point releases, I don't think C++03 users would want to stick with an
old Boost version.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk