Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-18 15:48:05
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >>> Isn't it time to require C++11 to avoid spending / wasting time on
> >>> these issues?
> >> No.
> > Why not, where's the demand for C++03 support coming from?
My answer here isn't really about demand for C++03. Expanded, it's "I don't
know what specifically you're proposing, and I don't know who is supposed to
require C++11 from whom, but I don't think we should pursue it in any case
because I've run some of the possible answers in my head and none of them
are worth pursuing in my opinion."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk