Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-02-19 19:18:35

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] Legal problem with Stackoverflow contribution under the "Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0" license"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries"
Next in thread: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries"

> And some people are even writing libraries that require C++17 (Outcome?) and beyond (YAP?).

Outcome merely requires a highly conforming C++ 14 implementation. It
will make good use of C++ 20 if you can give it that though.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/

Next message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] Legal problem with Stackoverflow contribution under the "Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 3.0" license"
In reply to: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries"
Next in thread: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] C++03 / C++11 compatibility question for compiled libraries"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk